127 allegations. No harm. No patient complaints. But written from the nursing profession by 14 white colleagues. This is how racism hides behind paperwork
- Anika Ola
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
They Watched Her Not to Protect Patients, But to Bury Her
This case began at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, where a senior Black nurse — a long-serving professional — raised formal concerns about unsafe clinical practice and the racialised treatment of staff. Instead of being protected, she was monitored, moved, and eventually suspended. For over two years, she was represented by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) — who failed to recognise the racial dynamics at play and advised her to admit charges without proper explanation. It was only when Equality 4 Black Nurses (E4BN) stepped in that the full pattern of institutional retaliation and regulatory overreach began to unravel.

What Happened to One E4BN Member Is a Warning to Us All
In this story, “they” means the NHS Trust — her employer — and the NMC, the nursing regulator. They say nursing is about compassion. But for a Black nurse and E4BN member, the system showed her none. She didn’t harm a patient. She didn’t break the rules. There were no formal complaints. And yet, within two years she was suspended from work. By early 2021, she was referred to the regulator. Not because she posed a risk — but because she raised the alarm.
When Black Women Speak, They Are Watched — Not Heard
In 2018, this nurse made a protected disclosure — a formal whistleblowing complaint — about patient safety and the treatment of Black nurses in her department. She followed policy. She documented bullying by senior managers. She did what NHS posters tell you to do: speak up.
But instead of being protected, she was targeted.
She was rotated between wards without consistency.
She was denied meaningful mentorship.
She was never told she was under formal assessment.
And she was monitored more than she was supported.
From Watching to Suspension — A Short Timeline
The escalation was fast and deliberate:
In a high‑acuity area: 25 allegations in 70 days
In a specialist cardiac ward: 35 allegations in 23 days
In a general ward: 67 allegations in 86 days

There were no Datix reports, no safeguarding concerns, and no complaints from patients or families.
She wasn’t accused of harming anyone — she was accused of being “slow,” “lacking insight,” or “not using the correct tone.”
The following quotes come directly from the witness statements and oral evidence submitted during the public regulatory proceedings against this nurse. These statements made almost entirely by white colleagues — were used to build the case for her removal, despite the absence of any patient harm or formal complaints. Their language reveals more than their intent: it exposes the racialised assumptions, bias, and coded language that shaped how this Black nurse was viewed, judged, and treated.
Even student nurses would know this.” – Katherine Pollock“
She waved her arms and clenched her fists.” – Charlotte Kindner“
She just stood there doing nothing.” – Siobhan Lanigan“
I felt exhausted after working with her.” – Tess Pogorzelska“
She didn’t use the correct medical language.” – Rebecca Russell
These weren’t observations of clinical risk. They were personal opinions, laced with bias and assumption. The case was built not on safety — but on surveillance of a Black nurse’s presence.
The Referral That Hid the Truth
In November 2019, she was suspended for “not progressing.”
By February 2021, she was referred to the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC) — the body that oversees the nursing register and can permanently end a nurse’s career.
On the NMC referral form, the Trust was asked:
“Has this nurse ever raised concerns about patient safety or healthcare?”
The manager who submitted the form — who had been named in her whistleblowing — ticked “No.”
That lie erased the entire context.
If they had ticked “Yes,” the NMC would have been legally obliged to consider her case under whistleblower protection guidance. Instead, she was labelled a risk. Her protected disclosure was buried. And the person she reported for racism and bullying became the person who removed her.
127 Charges. Zero Harm.

The regulator listed 127 charges, each one attached to a separate date, giving the appearance of a serious, ongoing risk.
But here’s what’s true:
No patient came to harm
No medication error caused escalation
No complaint was made by patients or families
And yet:
18 charges have already collapsed — withdrawn, disproven, or admitted in error
Many others are vague, duplicated, or based on one-off subjective impressions
Some charges accuse her of:
Taking 20 minutes longer than expected to do a task
Not knowing a nurse’s initials on day one
Speaking too softly during handover
Being “too slow” at documenting — in a learning placement
None of this met the threshold for public protection. All of it was used to build a narrative of removal.
If You’re Black in the NHS, You Know This Story
You work twice as hard, but are the first to be questioned. You set a boundary and they call it “defensiveness.”You make a mistake and it's called “risk.”You speak up and they say you're “playing the race card.”
Black nurses across the UK tell us the same:
Extra surveillance during probation
Referrals for “attitude” or “style”
Unequal access to support
And escalating scrutiny after raising concerns
The tools of policy — Datix, referrals, appraisals, feedback forms — are used not for learning, but for control.
She Didn’t Fall — The System Did
This nurse didn’t walk away. She stayed. She stood her ground. And with E4BN behind her, she revealed:
The manager who referred her had been the subject of her protected disclosure
The NMC was never told the truth about her whistleblowing
Witnesses gave contradictory, racialised testimony
The regulator failed to interrogate the pattern — and instead endorsed it
Her union (The RCN) advised her to admit charges without understanding them
Even during her cross‑examination, the NMC case presenter asked:
“So everyone is lying because of your colour?”And falsely accused her E4BN representative of “rolling her eyes” during the hearing — a public attempt to discredit a Black advocate.
This wasn’t impartial regulation. It was institutional defence dressed as professionalism.
We Are Not Your Risk
This is not an isolated incident.
It is part of a wider system that treats Black nurses as expendable.That uses "support plans" to wear them down.That silences whistleblowers with process. That polices not just what we do — but who we are. We are not asking for favour.We are demanding fairness.

We are not your risk. We are your reckoning and we will not go quietly
The case is still ongoing before the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC). The panel is currently deliberating, and a final decision has not yet been made. If you are interested in attending the next public hearing or supporting our campaign for justice, please contact us at matron@equality4blacknurses.com. Your presence, voice, and solidarity matter.